English(EN) "the use of LLMs has become common in the literature review workflow, these tools do not replace the necessity for rigorous human oversight and authorial respon

LLMs在文献综述中普遍使用，但人工监督仍至关重要

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-05-14 00:25

大型语言模型（LLMs）的使用在进行文献综述的过程中现已广泛普及。然而，这些工具不能替代作者细致的人工监督和责任。无论是直接还是通过自动化系统，伪造引文都构成严重的道德违规。 AI

影响强调在将AI工具整合到学术工作流程中时，对人类判断和道德标准的持续需求。

排序理由该集群讨论了LLMs在学术写作中的伦理影响和正确使用，反映了对AI角色的意见或评论。

在 Mastodon — fosstodon.org 阅读 →

LLMs

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

报道来源 [1]

Mastodon — fosstodon.org TIER_1 English(EN) · [email protected] · 2026-05-14 00:25

"the use of LLMs has become common in the literature review workflow, these tools do not replace the necessity for rigorous human oversight and authorial respon

"the use of LLMs has become common in the literature review workflow, these tools do not replace the necessity for rigorous human oversight and authorial responsibility. An author who fabricates a citation commits a serious breach of ethics, and using an automated system as a pro…

链接 2026.aclweb.org/acl_statement

报道来源 [1]

"the use of LLMs has become common in the literature review workflow, these tools do not replace the necessity for rigorous human oversight and authorial respon

相关实体

相关话题