English(EN) How many of your paper (either paper you authored or reviewed) are desk rejected? [D]

AI研究论文的直接拒稿率很高

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-10-16 03:13

研究人员在向ICLR等会议提交论文时，遇到了很高的直接拒稿率。一位用户报告称，他审阅的一篇论文随后被直接拒稿，并指出许多同事也面临类似问题。还有未经证实的消息称，有人试图绕过投稿限制，这可能导致他们的论文被直接拒稿。 AI

影响表明AI研究出版流程中可能存在的挑战和效率低下问题。

排序理由讨论论文投稿和审稿过程，特别是直接拒稿。 [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 13 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Tool; 讨论论文投稿和审稿过程，特别是直接拒稿。 [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: paper; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: High; Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness: Breaking (< 6h); Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

r/MachineLearning TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/Striking-Warning9533 · 2026-10-16 03:13

您有多少篇论文（您撰写或审阅的）被直接拒稿？[D]

<div class="md"><p>Just spend 4h reviewing a paper while I was sick, gave it a 3/4. This morning got an email saying it's desk rejected. I saw many people around me also have many papers desk rejected. I heard, though idk how true it is, some people use multiple ac…