English(EN) I had this wild, crazy, thought about training # LLMs . This is a very challenging and expensive thing for the industry, apparently. What if the industry paid p

Mastodon 用户建议为人类创作者付费而非用于LLM训练

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-10-16 01:30

一位Mastodon用户向AI行业提出了一个非传统的想法：与其投入巨资训练大型语言模型，不如资助人类创作者。这种方法将包括为原创艺术、写作以及对不使用AI生成代码的自由和开源软件项目的贡献付费。该用户建议，这也可以扩展到支持那些避免在工作中大量使用AI的新闻机构和记者，最终以可能低于解决“模型崩溃”成本的方式，建立一个值得信赖的内容语料库。 AI

排序理由用户在平台上的观点，而非主要的行业事件。

在 Mastodon — mastodon.social 阅读 →

Mastodon

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 0 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Meme; 用户在平台上的观点，而非主要的行业事件。
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: opinion, other; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: Low; Off-topic or adjacent — cluster remains reachable but doesn't surface in AI-industry rankings.
Story freshness: Breaking (< 6h); Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

报道来源 [1]

Mastodon — mastodon.social TIER_1 English(EN) · [email protected] · 2026-10-16 01:30

我有一个关于训练#LLM的疯狂想法。这显然对行业来说是一项非常艰巨且昂贵的任务。如果行业支付p

I had this wild, crazy, thought about training # LLMs . This is a very challenging and expensive thing for the industry, apparently. What if the industry paid people to # create without the use of # AI # GenAI ? Pay for # art , pay for # writing , donate to # FOSS projects which …

本文如何被排名

报道来源 [1]

我有一个关于训练#LLM的疯狂想法。这显然对行业来说是一项非常艰巨且昂贵的任务。如果行业支付p

相关实体

相关话题