一些用户将任何在AI辅助下生成的代码标记为“垃圾”或“凭感觉编码”，而不考虑人工审查或质量标准，例如在Linux内核中。这种观点似乎源于一种看法，即此类代码是由不重视严谨开发实践的个人随意生成的。 AI
影响 这种观点反映了用户对AI生成代码的质量和可信度日益增长的看法和争论。
排序理由 关于AI生成代码的用户情绪/观点文章。
在 Mastodon — mastodon.social 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
AI辅助代码被用户标记为“垃圾”和“凭感觉编码”
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 0 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Meme
- 关于AI生成代码的用户情绪/观点文章。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- opinion
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- Standard
- On-topic for AI-industry coverage; kept in the public index.
- Story freshness
- Breaking (< 6h)
- Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
我看到人们将任何在某种程度上得到人工智能辅助的代码称为“垃圾”和“凭感觉编码”，即使这些代码经过了彻底的人工审查并符合质量标准
I see people referring to any code that was in any way aided by AI as "slop" and "vibe-coded" even if the code is thoroughly vetted by humans and meets quality standards, like the Linux kernel. What is the reasoning behind this? I'm inclined to think "slop" and "vibe-coding" refe…