一位Mastodon用户发现开源Codex仓库中有大量提交，归属于一个名为‘swastik-oai’的账户，该账户似乎是OpenAI的内部标识符。这一发现引发了对其贡献性质及其在OpenAI内部来源的担忧。 AI
排序理由 用户在社交媒体上生成的关于开源项目潜在内部活动的观察，缺乏官方确认或更广泛的行业影响。
在 Mastodon — sigmoid.social 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
在开源Codex仓库中发现OpenAI内部提交
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 0 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Meme
- 用户在社交媒体上生成的关于开源项目潜在内部活动的观察，缺乏官方确认或更广泛的行业影响。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- other
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- Standard
- On-topic for AI-industry coverage; kept in the public index.
- Story freshness
- Breaking (< 6h)
- Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
刚发现开源Codex仓库中有大量提交来自一个使用似乎是OpenAI内部ID和账户名‘swas’的用户
Just discovered that there are many commits on the open source Codex repo from someone using an ID that appears to be internal to OpenAI with account name ‘swastik-oai’. That’s SUPER fucked up. Like WTAF. # AI # OpenAI