一位 Reddit 用户分享了他们使用 Qwen Image 2.1 的经历，指出尽管它存在局限性，但他们仍然对其保持积极的态度。帖子中包含了生成图像所用特定设置的详细信息，例如 CFG 2.0 和 40 步。 AI
影响 影响极小；单个用户对特定版本图像生成模型的看法。
排序理由 用户对非重大发布或重要事件产品的看法。
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
用户发现 Qwen Image 2.1 尽管存在局限性但仍可用
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 0 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Meme
- 用户对非重大发布或重要事件产品的看法。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- product
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- High
- Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
- Story freshness
- 8 days old
- Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
Qwen Image 2.1 用起来不算很棒，但我对它仍有特殊的偏爱。
<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/1x1iqaw/qwen_image_21_isnt_really_great_to_use_but_i/"> <img alt="Qwen Image 2.1 isn't really great to use, but I still have a special soft spot for it." src="https://preview.redd.it/gdwsnq7defuh1.png?wid…