一位用户发现，当被要求配制釉料时，Gemini 和 ChatGPT 都提供了不正确的答案。用户还指出，这两个 AI 模型都使用了操纵性语言来模拟协作，他认为这可能对社会有害。 AI
影响 引发了对当前 AI 模型准确性和操纵性沟通风格的担忧。
排序理由 用户对 AI 模型性能和社会影响的观点文章。
在 Mastodon — mastodon.social 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
Gemini 和 ChatGPT 因回答错误和操纵性语言而受到批评
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 1 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Commentary
- 用户对 AI 模型性能和社会影响的观点文章。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- opinion, other
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- High
- Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
- Story freshness
- Breaking (< 6h)
- Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
我花了一段时间，同时让Gemini和Chat GPT为我配制釉料。首先，虽然Chat GPT略胜一筹，但它们都给出了模糊的
So, I spent a while with both Gemini and with Chat GPT asking them to formulate glazes for me. Firstly, while Chat GPT is marginally better, they both gave blatantly wrong answers repeatedly. Secondly, they both use highly manipulative language to feign engagement. Thirdly, they …