Simon Kasper教授对未指明的AI技术表达了强烈的负面看法，表示他两者都不用，因为他认为它们是“狗屎”。他的评论是在涉及“trump”和“ai”的讨论背景下发表的。 AI
排序理由 该条目是一篇社交媒体帖子，表达了强烈意见，但没有关于AI发展的可验证事实或新信息。
在 Mastodon — mastodon.social 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
教授称AI技术是“狗屎”
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 0 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Meme
- 该条目是一篇社交媒体帖子，表达了强烈意见，但没有关于AI发展的可验证事实或新信息。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- opinion
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- Low
- Off-topic or adjacent — cluster remains reachable but doesn't surface in AI-industry rankings.
- Story freshness
- Breaking (< 6h)
- Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
我两者都不用，因为它们都是狗屎。感谢您对此事的关注。SIMON KASPER教授 #trump #ai
I'm using neither, because both are HORSESHIT. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Professor SIMON KASPER # trump # ai