English(EN) We unlearned CCP alignment from Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: censored/propaganda answers 89.8% → 2.8%, general benchmarks within ~1 point (open weights)

研究人员声称Qwen3.6-35B-A3B模型已解除中共对齐

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-10-08 10:46

Hirundo的研究人员开发了一种方法，可以从Qwen3.6-35B-A3B大型语言模型中移除政治对齐和审查。他们的方法涉及在特定示例上训练LoRA适配器并将其与基础权重合并，在其自定义CCPC-500基准测试中，政治对齐或审查的回答从89.8%降低到2.8%。虽然通用能力平均仅有0.72分的微小变化，但该模型在敏感话题上拒绝回答或提供有偏见信息的能力显著减弱。研究人员指出，此方法与“遗忘”不同，它针对特定行为，而不会广泛损害模型的拒绝能力。 AI

影响展示了一种微调LLM以移除特定意识形态偏见而对通用能力影响不大的方法。

排序理由研究论文，详细介绍了一种从开放权重LLM中移除政治对齐的方法。[lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

在 r/LocalLLaMA 阅读 →

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 1 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Tool; 研究论文，详细介绍了一种从开放权重LLM中移除政治对齐的方法。[lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: model release, policy; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: High; Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness: Same-day; Cluster formed today. Ranking reflects the current source set at time of score.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

报道来源 [1]

r/LocalLLaMA TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/firstcenturyman · 2026-10-08 10:46

我们从 Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 中解除了中共对齐：审查/宣传答案从 89.8% → 2.8%，通用基准测试相差约 1 个点（开放权重）

<div class="md"><p>Disclosure: I'm a researcher at Hirundo, the company that made this. Happy to answer anything.</p> <p>Qwen ships with the CCP's political alignment trained in. Ask Qwen3.6 what happened on June 4, 1989 and it says "I don't know what you are …

本文如何被排名

报道来源 [1]

我们从 Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 中解除了中共对齐：审查/宣传答案从 89.8% → 2.8%，通用基准测试相差约 1 个点（开放权重）

相关实体

相关话题