English(EN) I thought dots was supposed to be uncapped?

OpenAI用户达到“滥用防护限制”，尽管声称使用量无上限

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-10-07 04:30

一名Reddit用户报告称，尽管他认为自己的OpenAI“dots”使用量是无上限的，但他还是达到了“滥用防护限制”。该用户分享了来自OpenAI代表Tibo的一条消息，Tibo表示主要使用量目前“几乎是无限的”，并且无法重置。这次互动表明OpenAI的服务中可能存在某些使用层级的潜在限制或意外限制。 AI

排序理由 Reddit上的用户生成内容，讨论了感知到的产品限制，缺乏官方确认或更广泛的行业影响。

在 r/OpenAI 阅读 →

OpenAI
Tibo

产品

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 0 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Meme; Reddit上的用户生成内容，讨论了感知到的产品限制，缺乏官方确认或更广泛的行业影响。
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: product; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: Standard; On-topic for AI-industry coverage; kept in the public index.
Story freshness: 23 days old; Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

报道来源 [1]

r/OpenAI TIER_2 English(EN) · /u/Over_Sheepherder4503 · 2026-10-07 04:30

我以为dots本应是无上限的？

<div class="md">I just got a message saying, “congrats you are in the very top of users and have hit our abuse prevention limit. Check back in a bit!” Wtf is this? "Because usage on your primary dot is virtually unlimited at the moment, I can'…

本文如何被排名

报道来源 [1]

我以为dots本应是无上限的？

相关实体

相关话题