缅因州一家联邦法院因一名律师提交了可能由AI生成的过长文件而对其进行制裁。法院指出该文件缺乏简洁性并具有明显的AI特征，处以500美元罚款，并要求其继续接受法律教育和未来使用AI的认证。该律师在被告知AI工具（如ChatGPT）已改进并修复了捏造问题后，恢复使用这些工具，但未能充分核实生成的内容。 AI
影响 凸显了AI在法律实践中的风险以及核实的必要性，可能影响未来法院关于AI使用的规则。
排序理由 涉及律师滥用AI工具和法院制裁的法律案件。
在 Mastodon — mastodon.social 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 4 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
... regularly narrating what it is doing rather than just doing it, e.g., (“Defendant states the posture of that case rather than leaving the government to state it: ....”). The Court further stated that if counsel is welcome to use # AI to assist in drafting, but “the Court expe…
# LegalEthics Tidbit: Will the # AI please just get to the point already? A represented criminal defendant in ME federal court sought leave to file a motion for a new trial that was 80 pages long and that was accompanied by a 101 page declaration of counsel. The Court observed th…
... condition that had intensified during the period, and was looking to save both time and money [Ed. Note: this feels like the real reason]. The sanction included a $500 fine, CLEs, and a certification requirement for future filings by him (about whether and how he used # AI ).
... aware of the risks of # AI and stopped using it. Then, an acquaintance in the AI industry told him that “they are constantly making improvements, that ChatGPT has changed enormously in the ensuing months, and that ChatGPT fixed the fabrication problem.” So, he “bought into th…