一位Reddit用户提议OpenAI应该建立协作式问题解决中心。这些中心将利用数千个AI代理并行工作，类似于解决纳维-斯托克斯方程的方式。该想法是允许个人贡献他们的“点数”或想法到这些集体努力中，根据他们的专业知识指导AI的进展。 AI
排序理由 Reddit用户关于AI假设应用的建议。
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 2 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
OpenAI用户建议设立协作式AI问题解决中心
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 0 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Meme
- Reddit用户关于AI假设应用的建议。
- Source corroboration
- 2 independent sources
- Multiple independent publishers reporting the same story raises confidence that it's real and newsworthy.
- Topics
- other
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- Low
- Off-topic or adjacent — cluster remains reachable but doesn't surface in AI-industry rankings.
- Story freshness
- Breaking (< 6h)
- Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [2]
-
既然点（dots）现在能主动工作了，它们就应该创建解决问题的中心，在那里你可以分享你的点，它们将成千上万地并行工作，就像它们处理纳维-斯托克斯方程一样，只不过现在是协作式的
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>then everyone will get their name in something important when breaktrhoughs happens, also you could guide the dot based on the current gathered progress so that it contributes w your ideas, if you are versed in that subject... thats the idea than…
-
既然点（dots）现在能主动工作了，它们就应该创建解决问题的中心，在那里你可以分享你的点，它们将像处理纳维-斯托克斯方程一样，成千上万地并行工作，只是现在是协作式的
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>thats the idea :) thanks</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/Fit_Reindeer9304"> /u/Fit_Reindeer9304 </a> <br /> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/1wxt8i4/now_that_dots_works…