English(EN) Does anyone separate OpenAI Batch spend from normal API spend internally?

OpenAI用户讨论将Batch API支出与一般预算分开

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-10-02 16:21

一位Reddit用户正在寻求关于将OpenAI的Batch API支出与其一般API支出分开的建议。他们指出，Batch使用（通常用于处理数据集或运行评估等任务）与标准API使用（通常与产品活动相关）的行为不同。当两者合并到一个预算中时，这种区别使得难以理解成本的增加，因此用户考虑单独跟踪Batch支出。 AI

影响随着批量处理的普及，API使用成本管理策略可能会发生变化。

排序理由用户讨论特定API产品的成本管理。

在 r/OpenAI 阅读 →

OpenAI

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 0 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Commentary; 用户讨论特定API产品的成本管理。
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: infra, product; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: High; Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness: 1 days old; Coverage has settled into its steady-state source set.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

报道来源 [1]

r/OpenAI TIER_2 English(EN) · /u/No_Refrigerator_8216 · 2026-10-02 16:21

内部是否有人将OpenAI的Batch支出与正常API支出分开核算？

<div class="md"><p>We’ve started using Batch more for work that doesn’t need to happen immediately and I am sure that I’ve been treating that usage the same as the rest of our OpenAI spend even though it behaves pretty differently. Our normal API usage mostly follo…

本文如何被排名

报道来源 [1]

内部是否有人将OpenAI的Batch支出与正常API支出分开核算？

相关实体

相关话题