English(EN) WM PAI Workshop at NeurIPS — confused about the acceptance/rejection process [D]

NeurIPS WM PAI Workshop 录用流程受到作者质疑

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-10-01 15:31

一位 Reddit 用户正在就 NeurIPS 的 WM PAI Workshop 的录用和拒稿流程寻求澄清。他们注意到，尽管自己的论文获得了 8、5 和 4 分的高置信度评分，但仍被拒绝。同样，他们评审的两篇论文，平均得分约为 7 分，也被拒绝了。该用户想知道是否有人被录用，高分是否是 NeurIPS Workshop 拒稿的常见情况，以及官方通知邮件是否只是延迟了。 AI

排序理由用户对研讨会的内部流程提出疑问，而非直接公告或发现。

在 r/MachineLearning 阅读 →

论文

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 0 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Commentary; 用户对研讨会的内部流程提出疑问，而非直接公告或发现。
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: paper; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: Standard; On-topic for AI-industry coverage; kept in the public index.
Story freshness: 7 days old; Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

报道来源 [1]

r/MachineLearning TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/Nibbana_0 · 2026-10-01 15:31

WM PAI 研讨会亮相 NeurIPS — 对录用/拒绝流程感到困惑 [D]

<div class="md"><p>I submitted a paper to the WM PAI workshop at NeurIPS and can now see the reviews and decision on OpenReview, but I didn't receive an official acceptance/rejection email.</p> <p>My reviewer scores were 8, 5, and 4, all with confidence 4, and the …

本文如何被排名

报道来源 [1]

WM PAI 研讨会亮相 NeurIPS — 对录用/拒绝流程感到困惑 [D]

相关实体

相关话题