一位用户在 r/MachineLearning 子版块上寻求关于在《机器学习研究汇刊》(TMLR) 提交论文后如何进行跟进的建议。他们已经回应了审稿人的意见并进行了修改，但一位审稿人尽管承认了回复，但并未提高评分，另一位审稿人则保持沉默。用户不确定这些审稿人未提供进一步反馈的含义。 AI
排序理由 用户关于出版物审稿流程的查询。
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
TMLR 投稿跟进：用户寻求关于审稿人沉默的建议
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 0 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Commentary
- 用户关于出版物审稿流程的查询。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- paper
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- Standard
- On-topic for AI-industry coverage; kept in the public index.
- Story freshness
- 3 days old
- Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
提交所有审稿人回复后，应如何跟进 TMLR 投稿？[D]
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I have responded to all the reviewers with proper rebuttals and modified draft. One interacted with me and after acknowledging the response kinda disappeared again after asking additional questions. I have replied to his additional questions too …