一位用户勉强使用GitHub Copilot协助编写Microsoft Word的VBA宏，主要用于信息检索和错误排查。用户发现让Copilot编写整个VBA程序体验不佳，并表示未来倾向于仅用于信息查询。 AI
影响 强调了用户情绪和AI编码助手在特定编程任务中的实际局限性。
排序理由 用户对使用AI工具进行编程任务的体验评论。
在 Mastodon — mastodon.social 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
用户发现Copilot有助于VBA信息查询，但无法生成完整程序
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 0 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Commentary
- 用户对使用AI工具进行编程任务的体验评论。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- product, other
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- High
- Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
- Story freshness
- 8 days old
- Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
我的工作有点迫使人们寻找使用AI的方法，所以上周我勉强使用co-pilot协助编写一些Word的VBA宏。我用了它
My work is kinda pressuring people to find ways to use AI now so last week I reluctantly used co-pilot to assist in writing some VBA macros for Word. I used it mostly for looking up information about different methods and properties and for helping with weird errors I was experie…