Cursor IDE 的用户正在讨论其“自动模式”的有效性，一些人质疑它是否仅将 Grok 用于所有任务。对话表明，用户希望在 IDE 的自动化功能中对模型选择有更多的控制权，尤其是在规划相关功能方面。 AI
影响 用户正在寻求对开发工具中人工智能模型选择更精细化的控制。
排序理由 关于现有 AI 驱动工具内特定功能的讨论。
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
Cursor IDE 用户就自动模式对 Grok 的依赖展开辩论
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 1 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Tool
- 关于现有 AI 驱动工具内特定功能的讨论。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- product, other
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- High
- Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
- Story freshness
- Same-day
- Cluster formed today. Ranking reflects the current source set at time of score.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
自动模式模型
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I am using auto mode now as many suggested,but i think cursor is only using grok for everything,should i use higher models in planning</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/No-Opportunity-9475"> /u…