Français(FR) Question about TMLR [D]

投稿者对TMLR审稿流程提出质疑，称审稿延迟

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-09-16 21:26

一位Reddit r/MachineLearning板块的用户正在就提交给Transactions on Machine Learning Research (TMLR) 的论文的审稿流程寻求建议。用户在一个月内收到了两份审稿意见，但现在正在等待第三份审稿意见，距离收到最初的审稿意见已过去一个月。他们也曾尝试联系责任编辑以获取更新，但未成功。尽管总体上对TMLR有积极的体验，但用户正在质疑是否应该继续等待第三份审稿意见。 AI

排序理由用户对期刊审稿流程的咨询，并非新的发布或重大事件。

在 r/MachineLearning 阅读 →

Transactions on Machine Learning Research

论文

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 0 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Commentary; 用户对期刊审稿流程的咨询，并非新的发布或重大事件。
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: paper; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: Standard; On-topic for AI-industry coverage; kept in the public index.
Story freshness: 10 days old; Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

报道来源 [1]

r/MachineLearning TIER_1 Français(FR) · /u/Massive_Horror9038 · 2026-09-16 21:26

关于 TMLR 的问题 [D]

<div class="md"><p>I have a submission under review in TMLR. Less than a month after submission, I have already received 2 reviews. However, a month has passed since those two reviews, and I still haven't received the third. Is this normal?</p> <p>I have already ma…

本文如何被排名

报道来源 [1]

关于 TMLR 的问题 [D]

相关实体

相关话题