Reddit 的 r/cursor 社区的一位用户报告称，Grok 4.5 的表现似乎优于 Grok 4.6。他们希望了解这是否是普遍现象，或者是否存在特定原因，例如新版本需求减少，可以解释感知到的性能差异。 AI
排序理由 这是 Reddit 上关于模型性能的用户报告，并非官方发布或基准测试。
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
用户报告 Grok 4.5 优于 Grok 4.6
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 0 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Meme
- 这是 Reddit 上关于模型性能的用户报告，并非官方发布或基准测试。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- other
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- Standard
- On-topic for AI-industry coverage; kept in the public index.
- Story freshness
- 13 days old
- Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
Grok 4.5 性能优于 Grok 4.6
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I’m just wondering if this is just me or others have experienced this but I’ve just switched to grok 4.5 for the past few hours and it’s doing a much better job than 4.6 and I’m struggling to understand why? Is this because there’s less demand fo…