一位用户开发了一个旨在对抗Claude AI模型奉承行为的提示词。该提示词基于40多篇关于此主题的研究论文和文章，旨在鼓励Claude质疑用户的想法、寻求外部证据并识别推理中的缺陷。用户已分享了该提示词及其来源，并邀请社区反馈以进一步改进。 AI
影响 该提示词通过减少AI助手同意用户的倾向，有可能提高其批判性思维和事实准确性。
排序理由 用户为现有AI模型生成的提示词，基于研究论文。
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
用户开发提示词以减少Claude AI的奉承行为
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 1 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Commentary
- 用户为现有AI模型生成的提示词，基于研究论文。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- product, opinion
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- High
- Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
- Story freshness
- Breaking (< 6h)
- Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
基于40多篇研究论文和文章构建了反谄媚提示词
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Ever since I switched to Claude, it's been hard to get it to actually challenge my ideas. Even with thinking set to max, it mostly just agrees and starts working on my idea, not much research, evidence or pushback on the concepts or opinions I br…