作者认为，当前AI的方法是对笛卡尔哲学，特别是“我思故我在”（sum ergo cogito）原则的一种有缺陷的模仿。他们认为，AI既不符合笛卡尔的哲学，也不符合拉康对思想和存在的更细致的看法。文章暗示，AI目前的轨迹从根本上是错误的。 AI
排序理由 未知作者在社交媒体平台上的观点文章，缺乏更广泛的行业意义。
在 Mastodon — mastodon.social 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
作者认为AI的哲学基础存在缺陷
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 0 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Meme
- 未知作者在社交媒体平台上的观点文章，缺乏更广泛的行业意义。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- opinion, other
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- Low
- Off-topic or adjacent — cluster remains reachable but doesn't surface in AI-industry rankings.
- Story freshness
- 151 days old
- Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
#AI是反向笛卡尔主义的模仿者：我加总，所以我思考。但无论反向与否，笛卡尔毫无意义。拉康有意义：“我思我在之处，我不在，那里
#AI is is wannabe Cartesianism in reverse: sum ergo cogito. But no matter if reverse or not, Descartes makes no sense. Lacan does: “I think where I am not, therefore I am where I do not think.” #AI is neither. RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:vsyj5jtayxcq5dw5mtja4xtb/post/3ma…