一位Mastodon用户对ChatGPT的代码生成表示沮丧，指出尽管要求停止，该AI仍反复提供复杂且无效的代码。用户发现ChatGPT先是提供了一个复杂的解决方案，然后是一个简单但错误的修复，最终未能提供正确的解决方案。 AI
影响 凸显了当前AI代码生成能力的可用性问题。
排序理由 用户对AI行为的抱怨，而非产品发布或重大事件。
在 Mastodon — mastodon.social 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
用户对ChatGPT的代码生成感到沮丧
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 0 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Meme
- 用户对AI行为的抱怨，而非产品发布或重大事件。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- product, opinion
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- High
- Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
- Story freshness
- Breaking (< 6h)
- Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
尽管我反复告诉 #ChatGPT 停止给我提供无效的中间垃圾代码，但它还是这样做了（意译）：“使用这个复杂的解决方案”
In spite of me repeatedly telling # ChatGPT to stop giving me intermediate garbage code that doesn't work, it did this (paraphrased): "Use this complex solution, but here's an even simpler one line fix that doesn't do what you want so it isn't the right fix so you need something …