PulseAugur
实时 20:12:19
English(EN) Using LLMs to help you write papers doesn’t help you get them published HT Nik John for sending me this fascinating paper by the editors of Organisational Scien

研究发现:AI写作论文导致拒稿率升高

一项最新研究表明,在学术写作中使用大型语言模型(LLM)会显著阻碍论文发表的前景。AI生成内容超过30%的手稿,其被直接拒稿的概率比AI使用量较少的手稿高出近30个百分点。此外,AI内容比例非常高(70%以上)的论文获得修改后重审决定的可能性要小得多,这表明编辑认为它们的质量较低。这项研究暗示,虽然LLM可以为个人提供加速,但它们与学术出版的实际激励机制不符,可能给作者和学术界带来负面外部性。 AI

影响 在学术论文中大量使用AI可能会导致出版成功率降低,这表明需要谨慎地将LLM整合到学术写作中。

排序理由 该集群包含一项关于AI在学术出版中使用的学术论文的调查结果。[lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

在 Mastodon — mastodon.social 阅读 →

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →

研究发现:AI写作论文导致拒稿率升高

本文如何被排名

Signal score
14 / 100
Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket
Tool
该集群包含一项关于AI在学术出版中使用的学术论文的调查结果。[lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
Source corroboration
Single-source cluster
Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics
paper, policy
Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance
High
Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness
Breaking (< 6h)
Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准

报道来源 [1]

  1. Mastodon — mastodon.social TIER_1 English(EN) · [email protected] ·

    使用LLMs辅助撰写论文无助于论文发表 HT Nik John 推荐了这篇由Organisational Scien编辑撰写的引人入胜的论文

    Using LLMs to help you write papers doesn’t help you get them published HT Nik John for sending me this fascinating paper by the editors of Organisational Science. If you’re interested in AI and scholarly publishing, read this paper: https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/ors…