作者表达了个人反对生成式机器学习的立场，将其比作“数字可卡因”。尽管持有这种强烈观点，但他们与在该领域工作的朋友们保持着尊重的关系，并承认彼此观点不同。 AI
排序理由 该条目是社交媒体上的个人观点帖子，并非新闻事件。
在 Mastodon — mastodon.social 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
作者将生成式AI比作“数字可卡因”，但仍维持友谊
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 0 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Meme
- 该条目是社交媒体上的个人观点帖子，并非新闻事件。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- opinion
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- Low
- Off-topic or adjacent — cluster remains reachable but doesn't surface in AI-industry rankings.
- Story freshness
- Breaking (< 6h)
- Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
我不使用生成式机器学习，但我有朋友在使用，我并不讨厌或鄙视他们中的任何一个。我只是试着去理解他们的观点，并
I don't use generative machine learning, but I have friends who do, and I don't hate or despise any of them. I just try to understand their point of view and discuss in a respectful way. They know I think it's digital cocaine, I know they vibe code, and we're still friends. # ai …