一位 Mastodon 用户报告称，他们关于 AI 抓取预防的查询得到了一个表明存在此类措施的回复。这与之前 Reddit 在被问及用户基于其公开帖子在政治倾向上的信息时似乎配合 Google Gemini 的经历形成了对比。 AI
排序理由 这是来自社交媒体帖子的个人轶事，并非重大的行业事件或发展。
在 Mastodon — mastodon.social 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
Mastodon 用户注意到 AI 抓取预防措施，并与 Reddit/Gemini 的互动进行对比
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 0 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Meme
- 这是来自社交媒体帖子的个人轶事，并非重大的行业事件或发展。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- other
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- Low
- Off-topic or adjacent — cluster remains reachable but doesn't surface in AI-industry rankings.
- Story freshness
- Breaking (< 6h)
- Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
我记得我停止（取消）了然后重新运行了查询。接下来发生的事情是可以预料的：一些关于防止抓取的内容。那是思想上的挑衅
@ proinsias IIRC I stopped (cancelled) then reran the query. What happened next was predictable: some blurb about prevention of scraping. That was thought-provoking, because less than a week earlier (30th August) it seemed to me that Reddit did the opposite – cooperated with Goog…