认知与计算神经科学教授Anil Seth认为，机器意识“极不可能”。他提出，为机器意识分配概率是有问题的，因为它预设了一个尚不存在的事实基础。Seth暗示，当前人工智能的状况以及我们对意识的理解不支持此类概率性论断。 AI
影响 挑战了机器即将实现通用人工智能和意识的观点。
排序理由 知名可信人士的观点文章。
在 Mastodon — mastodon.social 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
Anil Seth：机器意识“极不可能”
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 1 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Commentary
- 知名可信人士的观点文章。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- opinion, other
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- Standard
- On-topic for AI-industry coverage; kept in the public index.
- Story freshness
- Breaking (< 6h)
- Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
Anil Seth：机器意识“极不可能”。我的分歧与其说是关于数字。概率是基于一个事实的。
Anil Seth: machine consciousness is "vanishingly unlikely." My disagreement isn't so much about the number. A probability presupposes a fact for it to be about. At the borderline, I don't think there is one ... yet. # ai # philosophy New essay: https:// dougsmith773158.substack.c…