English(EN) I'm not an # AI purist or anything (though I'm much closer to that than being a booster), but man, people putting their whole Obsidian vault into an # LLM conte

将Obsidian保险库上传到LLM引发隐私担忧

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-09-04 19:24

用户对将整个Obsidian保险库上传到大型语言模型中的隐私影响表示担忧，特别是当这些模型不是完全本地运行时。这种做法从隐私角度来看可能存在风险，尤其是对于敏感的个人数据。 AI

影响提高了人们对将个人知识管理工具与大型语言模型集成时潜在数据隐私风险的认识。

排序理由该条目表达了用户对涉及AI的实践的意见和担忧，而不是报道特定的AI发布、研究或行业活动。

在 Mastodon — fosstodon.org 阅读 →

LLM
Obsidian

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 3 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Commentary; 该条目表达了用户对涉及AI的实践的意见和担忧，而不是报道特定的AI发布、研究或行业活动。
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: safety, product; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: High; Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness: Breaking (< 6h); Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

报道来源 [1]

Mastodon — fosstodon.org TIER_1 English(EN) · [email protected] · 2026-09-04 19:24

我不是什么#人工智能纯粹主义者（尽管我比成为吹捧者更接近于此），但天哪，人们把整个Obsidian保险库放进#大型语言模型里

I'm not an # AI purist or anything (though I'm much closer to that than being a booster), but man, people putting their whole Obsidian vault into an # LLM context if that model isn't 100% on-prem is freaking crazy to me from a # privacy standpoint

本文如何被排名

报道来源 [1]

我不是什么#人工智能纯粹主义者（尽管我比成为吹捧者更接近于此），但天哪，人们把整个Obsidian保险库放进#大型语言模型里

相关实体

相关话题