English(EN) What Cursor Auto actually costs per request now, and what 200,000 routed requests taught me about it

Cursor Auto的可变按请求定价引发用户成本担忧

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-09-03 09:04

一位用户分享了他们使用Cursor Auto按请求付费的经验，指出成本可能因用于路由的模型而有显著差异。他们发现，常规任务有时会被路由到昂贵的尖端模型，导致意外的开销。为了解决这个问题，他们开发了一个名为RelayPlane的开源代理工具，用于管理其自动化开发管道的请求路由和成本控制。 AI

影响强调了透明和可控的AI模型路由对于管理用户运营成本的必要性。

排序理由用户开发的用于管理AI模型路由成本的工具。

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 1 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Tool; 用户开发的用于管理AI模型路由成本的工具。
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: product, infra; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: High; Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness: Same-day; Cluster formed today. Ranking reflects the current source set at time of score.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

r/cursor TIER_2 English(EN) · /u/mrtrly · 2026-09-03 09:04

Cursor Auto每次请求的实际成本是多少，以及20万次路由请求教会了我什么

<div class="md"><p>Since Aug 24 there's no flat rate on Auto. Every request bills at whatever model Auto routes it to, at that model's list price. Composer 2.5 runs about $0.50 in and $2.50 out per million tokens. Same request on Opus 5 is $5 and $25. Fable 5 is $1…