一位Reddit用户正在寻求关于如何最好地利用两个Qwen模型（Qwen3.6 27B和Qwen3.6 35B）来执行agent编码任务的建议。他们正在两台独立的PC上并行运行这些模型，并希望了解考虑到规划、文档、代码编写和测试等功能，每个模型的最优角色分配。 AI
排序理由 这是一个关于模型配置的用户生成问题，而不是产品发布或重要的行业事件。
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
用户讨论Qwen模型在agent编码中的最佳角色分配
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 0 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Meme
- 这是一个关于模型配置的用户生成问题，而不是产品发布或重要的行业事件。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- product, other
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- High
- Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
- Story freshness
- Breaking (< 6h)
- Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
我在 PC-1 上运行 Qwen3.6 27B，在 PC-2 上运行 Qwen3.6 35B，所以它们可以并行运行。应该为它们分配什么角色来进行代码代理？
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Which one is for plan, whish one is for documenting, which one for writing code, which one for writing and running tests, which one [list continues]</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/Jebbyk1"> …