用户报告称，Grok 4.6 自最初发布以来速度明显变慢。一位用户指出，其响应速度现在比 Anthropic 的 Claude Opus 慢。这种减速可能是由于容量限制或开发人员的调整。 AI
影响 潜在的用户不满和与竞争模型的比较可能会影响采用率。
排序理由 用户对产品性能下降的评论。
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
用户报告 Grok 4.6 延迟问题，比 Claude Opus 慢
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 2 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Commentary
- 用户对产品性能下降的评论。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- product
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- High
- Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
- Story freshness
- Breaking (< 6h)
- Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
马斯克，你为什么削弱了 Grok 4.6 的延迟？它变得太慢了
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Since launch Grok 4.6 to now, responses have become extremely slow. I’m getting a faster response from Opus than from grok. </p> <p>At launch it was super quick! </p> <p>I wonder if they are tuning into capacity shortages</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->…