一位Reddit用户正在询问关于Cursor IDE中“Auto”功能的推荐和见解。他们对所使用的AI模型缺乏透明度以及该功能如何运作表示担忧，特别是质疑它是否会调整AI的“努力程度”。 AI
影响 这次讨论突显了用户对开发工具中AI功能可用性和透明度的情绪和潜在担忧。
排序理由 用户讨论AI相关工具中的特定功能。
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
Cursor IDE用户寻求关于“Auto”功能的推荐
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 2 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Tool
- 用户讨论AI相关工具中的特定功能。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- product, opinion
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- High
- Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
- Story freshness
- Same-day
- Cluster formed today. Ranking reflects the current source set at time of score.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
你们用cursor的Auto吗？推荐吗？
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I think i'm afraid not knowing which model is chosen, and the black boxy'ness of it.</p> <p>does the Auto feature also adjust effort level?</p> <p>thoughts would be appreciated</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://ww…