作者对人工智能的现状和围绕它的行业表示怀疑，认为许多反对意见是对行业的有效批评，而不是对技术本身的批评。他们认为，一旦行业当前的炒作周期崩溃，人工智能就可以作为一种更传统的技术集成。然而，作者作为一名作家和写作教师，个人觉得人工智能在他们的生活中毫无用处，并强调创作过程的价值胜过最终结果。 AI
影响 作者的观点表明，人工智能的广泛效用被夸大了，其集成可能仅限于特定行业。
排序理由 该集群包含来自社交媒体平台上的单个用户的观点文章，讨论他们对人工智能的看法。
在 Mastodon — mastodon.social 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 3 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
There are many objections to "AI," about half of which are objections to the industry that's pushing it, and the other half (energy and water waste, training data used without permission) are solvable problems. Once the industry collapses, it will become what it always was: norma…
I personally can find no use for it in my life. There's nothing that "AI" would help me do. I am a lifelong writer and writing instructor. The joy of creation is in the act, not the result. I get better at it by doing it, not by getting something to do it for me. This technology …
I am not an "AI" purist. I think the best approach is to treat it like a normal technology, like Ed Zitron has said. There are uses for this technology. They are limited and specific, and soon they will be the narrow domain of specific industries. But... # AI # LLM # technology #…