一位 Mastodon 用户对他们认为“BigAI”行业的供应商故意做出恶意的安全决策表示担忧。用户认为，鉴于这些决策的普遍性以及人们对其承认的抵制，这些决策并非简单的天真错误，而可能是故意的破坏或恶意软件的推广。 AI
排序理由 用户在社交媒体平台上对一般行业趋势的看法，而非具体事件或可验证的声明。
在 Mastodon — mastodon.social 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
BigAI 供应商被指控做出恶意安全决策
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 0 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Meme
- 用户在社交媒体平台上对一般行业趋势的看法，而非具体事件或可验证的声明。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- opinion, safety
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- Standard
- On-topic for AI-industry coverage; kept in the public index.
- Story freshness
- Breaking (< 6h)
- Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
当看到特定供应商（大致是：BigAI）中的一些人做出如此多明显愚蠢且在安全方面糟糕的决定时，这些决定广泛传播，并且可疑
When I see so many braindead-obviously-bad security-wise decisions made by folks in a specific subset of vendors (roughly: BigAI), spread broadly enough and sustained, and gaslit about, I find it harder to believe it is all due merely to innocent mistakes by the naive/young rathe…