PulseAugur
中
实时 23:30:19
English(EN) They made Fable 5 so insanely restrictive, I can no longer work with Fable 5 on any of my University projects, or most engineering-related things related to my UG Aerospace Engineering course which has essentially standard UK modules and content related to mechanical and Aerospace engineering.

用户报告称Anthropic的Fable 5对工程项目过于限制

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] ·

一位Reddit用户对Anthropic的Fable 5模型表示不满，称其内容过滤器过于严格，导致无法用于大学工程项目。该用户报告称，即使经过大量编辑和明确指示不要访问过去的对话，模型仍频繁阻止响应。这位最近购买了200欧元套餐的用户表示，如果限制持续存在，他们将取消订阅，并指出Opus 5的质量似乎有所下降。 AI

影响 过于限制性的AI模型可能会阻碍其在工程和研究等专业领域的应用。

排序理由 用户对模型限制和感知到的质量下降的反馈。

在 r/Anthropic 阅读 →

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →

用户报告称Anthropic的Fable 5对工程项目过于限制

本文如何被排名

Signal score
1 / 100
Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket
Commentary
用户对模型限制和感知到的质量下降的反馈。
Source corroboration
Single-source cluster
Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics
product, opinion
Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance
High
Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness
Breaking (< 6h)
Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

报道来源 [1]

  1. r/Anthropic TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/More-Cup5793 ·

    他们把Fable 5搞得太限制了，我再也无法在我的任何大学项目中使用Fable 5，也无法在与我的航空航天工程本科学位相关的绝大多数工程项目中使用，该学位拥有标准的英国模块和与机械及航空航天工程相关的内容。

    <table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Anthropic/comments/1w2tr60/they_made_fable_5_so_insanely_restrictive_i_can/"> <img alt="They made Fable 5 so insanely restrictive, I can no longer work with Fable 5 on any of my University projects, or most engineering-related th…

相关实体

相关话题