English(EN) Hair trigger account deactivation after a file-edit request appears to have included benchmark text - then closed my clarifying appeal as “duplicate"

OpenAI 因配置文件编辑中的基准测试文本停用账户

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-08-30 06:24

一名用户报告称，在编辑配置文件时无意中包含审查基准测试文本后，其 OpenAI 账户被停用。用户解释说，基准测试文本仅作为编辑 JSON 文件的参考材料存在，而不是直接查询违禁内容。尽管第二次申诉澄清了这一背景，但仍被视为重复申诉而被关闭，用户对不透明和武断的执行过程感到沮丧。 AI

影响凸显了 AI 服务中自动化内容审核系统潜在的问题以及在执法中考虑上下文的重要性。

排序理由用户报告了特定产品执行策略的问题。

在 r/OpenAI 阅读 →

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 11 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Tool; 用户报告了特定产品执行策略的问题。
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: product, policy; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: High; Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness: Breaking (< 6h); Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

报道来源 [1]

r/OpenAI TIER_2 English(EN) · /u/MaxPhoenix_ · 2026-08-30 06:24

文件编辑请求似乎包含基准测试文本后，账户被触发式停用——随后我的澄清申诉被以“重复”为由关闭

<div class="md"><p>My OpenAI account was recently shown as "deleted or deactivated" - hopefully temporarily, because based on what I’ve now verified, I did not intentionally use OpenAI’s model to ask for anything prohibited.</p> <p>At first, I assumed I h…

本文如何被排名

报道来源 [1]

文件编辑请求似乎包含基准测试文本后，账户被触发式停用——随后我的澄清申诉被以“重复”为由关闭

相关实体

相关话题