PulseAugur
实时 15:59:41
English(EN) acl arr august 2026 (desk rejected ) [D]

ACL 拒绝引用先前 ARR 评审的论文,用户寻求补救

一位用户在 r/MachineLearning 子版块上寻求建议,因为他们的论文被计算语言学协会(ACL)在 2026 年 8 月退稿。退稿理由引用了先前的 ARR 评审,但用户声称从未发生过。他们正在寻求关于如何处理这种情况的指导。 AI

排序理由 用户关于研究会议论文提交问题的查询。[lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=0.7]

在 r/MachineLearning 阅读 →

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →

ACL 拒绝引用先前 ARR 评审的论文,用户寻求补救

本文如何被排名

Signal score
0 / 100
Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket
Tool
用户关于研究会议论文提交问题的查询。[lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=0.7]
Source corroboration
Single-source cluster
Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics
paper
Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance
High
Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness
20 days old
Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准

报道来源 [1]

  1. r/MachineLearning TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/malakulmout347 ·

    acl 2026年8月 (桌面拒绝) [D]

    <!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I have got two papers which got desk rejected by PC saying they are previously got reviewed in arr. But those paper never got submitted ever. Any idea what can be done? </p> </div><!-- SC_ON --> &#32; submitted by &#32; <a href="https://www.reddi…