English(EN) The absolute insanity of comments in Opus 5.0 is killing me

Anthropic 的 Opus 5.0 因过度和错误的注释而受到批评

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-08-19 00:44

用户报告称 Anthropic 的 Opus 5.0 模型表现出问题行为，即使在被指示不要这样做的情况下，也会添加过多的不正确注释。据观察，此问题会破坏 bash 脚本的语法，表明该模型可能对基本脚本语言的理解存在缺陷。尽管模型似乎认识到自己的错误，但问题仍然存在。 AI

影响 Opus 5.0 在代码生成和指令遵循方面可能存在的问题，可能会影响用户信任和采用。

排序理由用户对最近发布的模型版本的反馈。

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 0 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Commentary; 用户对最近发布的模型版本的反馈。
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: model release, product; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: High; Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness: 51 days old; Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

r/ClaudeAI TIER_2 English(EN) · /u/f00dl3 · 2026-08-19 00:44

Opus 5.0 中评论的绝对疯狂正在折磨我

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1vs7cdt/the_absolute_insanity_of_comments_in_opus_50_is/"> <img alt="The absolute insanity of comments in Opus 5.0 is killing me" src="https://preview.redd.it/teneqp3aa8kh1.png?width=640&crop=smart&auto=…