某人的儿子就肩部损伤咨询了人工智能的医疗建议，AI提供了多种选择。然而，一位骨科医生认为AI的建议不准确，并强调了手术的必要性。这一事件凸显了一个担忧，即AI被视为一种可以被选择性采纳的信息来源，这让人联想到彼得·纳瓦罗等政治人物，他们曾就科学或医学权威做出过可疑的比较。 AI
影响 引发了对AI在关键建议方面可靠性的担忧，并强调了人类专业知识在医学等领域持续的重要性。
排序理由 该集群包含关于AI可靠性的个人轶事和观点，而非事实事件或发布。
在 Mastodon — fosstodon.org 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 2 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
When my son asked AI about his shoulder injury, it gave him multiple options. He was so impressed with what a great job it had done. He went to the orthopod who said, that's bullshit. If you ever want to use that arm again, your only option is surgery. Thank God my son recognized…
I now understand that AII is seen as a "multiple choice" option and everyone is free to pick which one they want to believe. Cue the Peter Navarro "Google is as good as Fauci" syndrome. "Well, AI said..." # AI 2/3