作者认为，所有功利主义者都应坚持古典功利主义，该主义优先考虑最大化总幸福减去痛苦。他们认为，其他提议的善，如知识或人际关系，之所以有价值，仅仅是因为它们有助于幸福。此外，作者反驳了痛苦本身比幸福更重要的观点，认为风险规避和缺乏深刻的积极体验使人们倾向于这种看法。 AI
排序理由 该条目是一篇主张特定哲学立场的评论文章。
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
古典功利主义：最初且最佳的方法
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 0 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Commentary
- 该条目是一篇主张特定哲学立场的评论文章。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- opinion
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- Low
- Off-topic or adjacent — cluster remains reachable but doesn't surface in AI-industry rankings.
- Story freshness
- 12 days old
- Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
所有功利主义者都应是古典功利主义者
<p><span>This is a crosspost from my </span><a href="https://jamesbrobin.substack.com/p/why-all-utilitarians-should-be-classical" rel="noreferrer"><span>blog post</span></a><span>.</span></p><p><span>I recently had the great joy of meeting a group of utilitarians, but, to my comp…