Dansk(DA) AI is horrible at 3D and i feel like it will never get better .

用户抨击AI的3D能力“无用”且“垃圾”

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-08-15 09:05

一位Reddit用户对当前AI的能力，尤其是在3D工作和创意任务方面，表达了极大的沮丧。他们发现像Opus 5和Sol 5.6这样的模型在纹理生成和网格处理方面效果不佳，尽管提供了大量的上下文和参考。该用户还批评AI在Substance Painter等软件上的建议毫无帮助，其代码重写能力产生的输出也毫无意义。他们认为AI被过度炒作，距离真正用于复杂的现实世界应用还有很多年，只有在编码方面它才显示出一些用处。 AI

影响强调了当前AI在创意和复杂任务中的局限性，表明炒作与实际效用之间存在差距。

排序理由用户对AI局限性的观点文章。

在 r/Anthropic 阅读 →

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 0 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Commentary; 用户对AI局限性的观点文章。
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: opinion, product; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: High; Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness: 54 days old; Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

报道来源 [1]

r/Anthropic TIER_1 Dansk(DA) · /u/anonthatisopen · 2026-08-15 09:05

人工智能在3D方面很糟糕，我觉得它永远不会好转。

<div class="md"><p>Opus 5 and Sol 5.6 are useless for 3D work. The results are garbage every single time, and the amount of context I give it changes nothing. I can hand it the reference image, the mesh, the manual unwrapped UVs, MCP (AI is still incapable of doing…

本文如何被排名

报道来源 [1]

人工智能在3D方面很糟糕，我觉得它永远不会好转。

相关实体

相关话题