Reddit r/MachineLearning板块的一名用户报告称，一篇论文的AC（Area Chair）评论和他们随后的回复已从OpenReview上消失。该用户推测，AC可能为了避免在论文被拒时显得不合理而删除了评论。他们想知道这种情况是否常见。 AI
排序理由 Reddit上用户生成的内容讨论了评审平台可能存在的问题，缺乏更广泛的行业意义。
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
AC评论和回复从OpenReview消失，用户寻求答案
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 0 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Meme
- Reddit上用户生成的内容讨论了评审平台可能存在的问题，缺乏更广泛的行业意义。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- other
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- Low
- Off-topic or adjacent — cluster remains reachable but doesn't surface in AI-industry rankings.
- Story freshness
- 18 days old
- Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
AC评论和我们的回复在OpenReview上消失了 [D]
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi everyone, we noticed that the AC's comment, along with our reply, has disappeared, and we are wondering if anyone else has experienced the same thing. </p> <p>The comment was made by the AC on the first day the reviews were released and summar…