English(EN) TMLR Relevance and Prestige [D]

TMLR 的声望受到顶级 AI 会议和期刊的质疑

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-08-13 23:16

r/MachineLearning 上的一位用户正在试图了解机器学习研究汇刊 (Transactions on Machine Learning Research, TMLR) 的声望和相关性。他们将其与 NeurIPS、ICLR 和 ICML 等顶级会议以及 JMLR 期刊进行比较。 AI

影响这次讨论突显了社区对研究发表场所的看法，影响了作者的选择以及 AI 研究的可感知影响。

排序理由用户对研究出版物声望的提问。

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 0 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Commentary; 用户对研究出版物声望的提问。
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: paper; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: High; Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness: 62 days old; Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

r/MachineLearning TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/Awesome_Nerd10 · 2026-08-13 23:16

TMLR 相关性和声望 [D]

<div class="md"><p>I recently had a paper accepted to TMLR and was wondering how prestigious it is, in comparison to A* conferences (ie. NeurIPS, ICLR, ICML), but also vs journals like JMLR. </p> </div>   submitted by   <a href="https://www.re…