English(EN) "Human-in-the-loop" isn't enough. You need an "expert-in-the-loop," which probably means the person you laid off so you could pay 75% of that salary to Anthropi

AI成本削减可能适得其反，需要重新聘用被解雇的专家

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-08-13 17:19

一篇社交媒体帖子认为，仅依靠人工智能系统中的人工监督是不够的，主张采用“专家协同”的方法。作者认为，公司试图通过用AI（如Anthropic的模型）取代人类专家来削减成本，可能会面临未来的挑战，并需要以更高的成本重新聘用这些专家。 AI

影响表明涉及AI的成本削减措施可能导致长期的运营效率低下和未来成本的增加。

排序理由来自社交媒体帖子的观点文章，讨论AI实施策略。

在 Mastodon — fosstodon.org 阅读 →

Anthropic

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

报道来源 [1]

Mastodon — fosstodon.org TIER_1 English(EN) · [email protected] · 2026-08-13 17:19

"Human-in-the-loop" isn't enough. You need an "expert-in-the-loop," which probably means the person you laid off so you could pay 75% of that salary to Anthropi

"Human-in-the-loop" isn't enough. You need an "expert-in-the-loop," which probably means the person you laid off so you could pay 75% of that salary to Anthropic. Have fun rehiring your expert in 6 months when it's not working out the way you'd planned. I'm sure they'll come back…

报道来源 [1]

"Human-in-the-loop" isn't enough. You need an "expert-in-the-loop," which probably means the person you laid off so you could pay 75% of that salary to Anthropi

相关实体

相关话题