开发者正在探索在代码库中实施“无AI”政策的方法，以告知用户并防止意外生成AI代码。讨论的重点是创建样板文本，以清晰地将此政策传达给人类用户和编码代理。 AI
影响 开发者正在考虑控制其项目中AI生成代码的方法，这可能会影响AI工具与开源开发的交互方式。
排序理由 关于在代码库中实施AI政策的讨论，而非直接发布或重大行业事件。
在 Mastodon — fosstodon.org 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
开发者探索代码库的“无AI”政策
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 0 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Commentary
- 关于在代码库中实施AI政策的讨论，而非直接发布或重大行业事件。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- product, policy
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- High
- Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
- Story freshness
- 57 days old
- Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
我看到这里有一些关于代码代理指令的仓库样板的帖子，其中规定仓库禁止使用 AI，以此告知用户而非生成
I've seen some posts on here about repository boilerplate for instructing coding agents that a repo has a no AI policy, and this to inform users rather than generating patches. Is there a best practice example? I wound like to add this to one of my projects. # OSS # OpenSource # …