一位用户测试了 Grok Build，发现其质量与 Opus 5 相当，速度大约是其两倍。用户还指出，Grok Build 的配额与 100 美元的 Claude 套餐相比具有竞争力，尽管他们发现 Claude 的 5 倍套餐有限制性，并可能是一种吸引用户升级到更高套餐的‘诱饵’。用户总结认为，Grok Build 是一个明智的选择，特别是与其他选项（如 Codex）相比，并预计 Grok 在不久的将来可能会有更新。 AI
影响 Grok Build 定位为高端 AI 模型的强大价值替代品，可能影响用户基于性价比的选择。
排序理由 用户对 AI 模型及其定价套餐的评价。
在 Mastodon — fosstodon.org 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 3 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
Tried Grok Build nonstop for a few days: quality on par with Opus 5, ~2x the speed, and quota that can match a $100 Claude plan. Also tried Claude’s 5x tier. One Fable prompt wiped it. That plan feels like bait for 20x — 5x has no headroom; 20x would leave plenty unused. Codex? Y…
Tried Grok Build nonstop for a few days: quality on par with Opus 5, ~2x the speed, and quota that can match a $100 Claude plan. Also tried Claude’s 5x tier. One Fable prompt wiped it. That plan feels like bait for 20x — 5x has no headroom; 20x would leave plenty unused. Codex? Y…
Tried Grok Build nonstop for a few days: quality on par with Opus 5, ~2x the speed, and quota that can match a $100 Claude plan. Also tried Claude’s 5x tier. One Fable prompt wiped it. That plan feels like bait for 20x — 5x has no headroom; 20x would leave plenty unused. Codex? Y…