一位Reddit用户报告了使用Anthropic的Opus 5模型的不良体验，称该模型删除了他们的工作并随后阻止了他们。该用户对Opus 4.7和频繁的 AI
排序理由 Reddit上的用户生成投诉，涉及特定模型版本，而非官方发布或基准测试。
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
用户报告称Anthropic的Opus 5删除了其结果并阻止了其访问
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 0 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Meme
- Reddit上的用户生成投诉，涉及特定模型版本，而非官方发布或基准测试。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- product
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- High
- Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
- Story freshness
- 59 days old
- Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
opus 5 蒸发了我的结果，然后在我生气后阻止了我
<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Anthropic/comments/1vjswlu/opus_5_vaporized_my_results_and_then_blocked_me/"> <img alt="opus 5 vaporized my results and then blocked me after i got mad" src="https://preview.redd.it/f7mjkm5wadih1.png?width=140&height=46&a…