(SO) Qwen3.8-max: 53 on AA index

Qwen3.8-Max 在 AA 指数上获得 53 分，落后于 Kimi K3

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-08-03 19:45

Qwen3.8-Max 模型在用于评估 AI 模型的基准 AA 指数上获得了 53 分。虽然这一表现被认为是尚可的，但值得注意的是，它在编码指数上与 glm 5.2 模型相当，并且不如 Kimi K3 模型有效。该模型的成本也被提及高于某些替代方案。 AI

影响这一基准为了解 AI 模型性能，尤其是在编码相关任务上的性能，提供了一个数据点。

排序理由该条目讨论了 AI 模型的特定基准分数，属于研究范畴。[lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 0 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Tool; 该条目讨论了 AI 模型的特定基准分数，属于研究范畴。[lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: model release; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: High; Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness: 86 days old; Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

r/LocalLLaMA TIER_1 (SO) · /u/_AnemicRoyalty_ · 2026-08-03 19:45

Qwen3.8-max: 在AA指数上获得53分

<div class="md">Not too shabby, was expecting it to be better. Does roughly the same as glm 5.2 on coding indices, worse than kimi k3. More expensive though. <a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/qwen3-8-max?intelligence=coding-index">https…