一位r/MachineLearning子版块的用户正在寻求建议，因为他们的评论和反驳没有得到任何回应。用户特别提到，即使是被称为“AC”的实体和审稿人也没有回复，尽管提交的材料在讨论期结束前很久就已提交。 AI
排序理由 该条目是关于子版块用户对评论无人回应的提问，不构成重大新闻事件。
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
机器学习社区寻求对未回复评论的回应
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 0 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Meme
- 该条目是关于子版块用户对评论无人回应的提问，不构成重大新闻事件。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- other
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- Low
- Off-topic or adjacent — cluster remains reachable but doesn't surface in AI-industry rankings.
- Story freshness
- 67 days old
- Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
对AC[D]的反驳和评论均未收到回复
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Not even the AC, nor reviewers, is responding to our comments in rebuttals, and they were all submitted well before the discussion period started. What is one to do in this case?</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://…