PulseAugur
中
实时 09:59:05
English(EN) EMNLP vs AACL commitment: Meta 3.5, reviews 3/3/4, what to do?[D]

研究人员就 EMNLP vs AACL 会议投稿寻求建议

一位机器学习研究人员正在就将论文提交给 EMNLP 或 AACL 会议寻求建议。该论文收到的评审平均分为 3/3/4,元评审得分为 3.5,表明这是一篇处于会议投稿边缘的论文。研究人员正在权衡 EMNLP 主会、EMNLP Findings、AACL 主会和 AACL Findings 的声望和录用机会,并考虑元评审者对实证严谨性和演示文稿的积极评价。 AI

排序理由 该集群讨论了一位研究人员关于向学术会议提交论文的决定,这属于研究范畴。[lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

在 r/MachineLearning 阅读 →

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →

研究人员就 EMNLP vs AACL 会议投稿寻求建议

本文如何被排名

Signal score
0 / 100
Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket
Tool
该集群讨论了一位研究人员关于向学术会议提交论文的决定,这属于研究范畴。[lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
Source corroboration
Single-source cluster
Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics
paper
Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance
High
Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness
72 days old
Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

报道来源 [1]

  1. r/MachineLearning TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/Effective-Yam-7656 ·

    EMNLP 对 AACL 的承诺:Meta 3.5,评论 3/3/4,怎么办?[D]

    <!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I'm trying to decide whether to commit my ARR May 2026 paper to <strong>EMNLP</strong> or <strong>AACL</strong>. (first time solo independent author).</p> <p>Final reviews after rebuttal (OA/Confidence/Excitement ):</p> <ul> <li>R1: <strong>2.5 →…