一位 Reddit 用户正在询问 Cursor 的 Cloud Agents 功能的隐私影响，特别是比较“隐私遗留模式”和“新的隐私模式”。用户担心他们的代码被用于训练或超出服务提供范围的重用，并寻求关于切换模式的差异和潜在缺点的澄清。 AI
影响 阐明了用户对 AI 驱动的编码工具中数据隐私的担忧。
排序理由 用户对软件产品中特定功能的隐私设置的询问。
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
Cursor Cloud Agents 隐私模式受到审视
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 0 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Tool
- 用户对软件产品中特定功能的隐私设置的询问。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- product, safety
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- High
- Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
- Story freshness
- 43 days old
- Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
云代理遗留隐私模式
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I recently switched back to Cursor and I’m considering trying Cloud Agents. One thing I really like about Claude Code is being able to continue working in the cloud from my iPhone, and I’d like to have that same flexibility in Cursor.</p> <p>This…